Blizzard: Our new, secret project is "totally awesome"
It's not World of Warcraft, it's not Starcraft II, but it is, according to Blizzard, totally awesome, and it's in super-secret development by a super-secret sect of the company called Team 3. It was during a conversation about workforce with Gamasutra when Frank Pearce, senior vice president of product development for Blizzard, semi-spilled the proverbial beans. After mentioning the 40-person Team 3, Pearce would only add "Team 3 is working on something really awesome. I can't give you any hints, but it's totally awesome."
Oh, no hints? Too bad that we've already cracked the case. With Blizzcon just around the bend, hopefully we'll find out if our hunch holds water. What's your theory?
Oh, no hints? Too bad that we've already cracked the case. With Blizzcon just around the bend, hopefully we'll find out if our hunch holds water. What's your theory?




















(Page 1) Reader Comments
Reply
Reply
Reply
Several ex Blizz employees said Diablo 3 WAS in the works a while ago, so.... on verra
Reply
Reply
It seems like everything Blizzard releases is pure gold, and I'm sure any new IP's they develop will be no different.
Reply
"BoatCraft" or "DudeCraft" or "CakeCraft"
Reply
I can't wait to start my Coconut Cake Guild
So why do they have twice as many people working on cinematics compared to teams 2 and 3? Blizzard has released two full games and two expansion sets in five years. That's not enough cinemtatics to keep so many people busy for so long. Is Blizzard doing a full length World of Warcraft CGI movie?
Reply
I'm not suprized that there are more on the Cinematic team than the programming team. Those movies take alot of manpower.
Blizzard has always done great CGI, not only their realism, but the effect and depth that the scenes have. Think back to StarCraft when you had the Battlecruiser leaving the Terrans behind, to get pwned by the Zerg, or the Act 2 cinematic in Diablo 2. Truly stunning work.
Of course, that's just me dreaming. It'll probably be Diablo III, which understandable, considering that Diablo fans have been waiting for a sequel nearly as long as StarCraft fans.
Reply
Oh, and who says its a new game? It could easily be an update - maybe a Diablo 2 for a next gen system, prepared for online play, with updated graphics and obviously controls. To me, that'd totally kick arse.
Blizzard hasn't done a console game in a while - the last being their port of the lost vikings, IIRC.
Reply
and it still sucked
look at Guild Wars for example, where skill strength only matters on your investment in its "attribute", so that all (90%) skills suck at 0 attrib and rock at 16. Diablo should do something like that.
Reply
I mean honestly, what would you want diablo 3 to look like? And how is that different from GW.
Reply
How exactly is the MMO like Diablo 2 in terms of playstyle?
I love Guild Wars--it's a great game, especially for those not wanting to make the monthly payments to play WoW, but it isn't Diablo.
MMOs, because of their persistant world, and recycled quests, cant come close to duplicating what Diablo is.
Diablo 3
Seems to make sense to me.
Reply
Reply
Guild Wars is like diablo in that you run around and slash stuff to complete quests and gain exp
it is not a "true MMO" in that there are players everywhere, mostly instances of zones, similar to diablo2's instanced games. However unlike Diablo you don't have to leave games into lobbies to find people to play, you can just go to any town (walking or map teleporting) and meet up with people there to do quests or missions or whatever.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply